ASK AN EXPERT

Q.

Greetings, the alginate sheet to encapsulate living islet cells implanted in people with Type 1 Diabetes has greatly captured my interest. It's been mentioned that human trials are set to begin in 2013. Why not in 2012? In addition how long will this human trial take? Or should I say in how many years? Right now all other different types of Type 1 research is into different "phases" of human trials and it feels that it will never come into fruition. I still don't see anything coming into the market place. In addition once this is introduced to the public how much would this procedure cost? I know I am a little ahead with these questions but I am getting very tired of waiting and still waiting. Right now since my very first day of Diagnosis there is nothing out there. Insulin was discovered in 1921. Guess what we are still insulin dependent as we are still using insulin only there are different versions to it. What is wrong with this picture as we are now in 2012 and still there is nothing out there. I also agree the Edmonton Protocal is not the best choice as you have to take immune suppression drugs for life and suffer with the side effects and other health problems. In 3-5 years this comes back so it's NOT a cure. Best regards, from a frustrated Type 1 Diabetic for 22+ miserable years.

A.

Tania, as another person with long-term type 1 diabetes (since 1977) I share your interest. We have been working on the Islet Sheet for many years and the fact is many years will be required before it will be a product on the market. Part of this is the... READ MORE

A multiple-dose disposable insulin pen. Corbis photo.

A Short Biography of Type 1

This page is in process. Until it is completed, we offer this essay by Dr, Andrew Drexler of our Scientific Review Committee, which notes some of the key events in our growing knowledge about diabetes and its treatment.

Diabetes: Past, Present, Future

By Andrew Drexler, MD

July 27, 2009

Diabetes is one of mankind’s oldest known diseases, having been first described in Ancient Egypt in the Ebers papyrus. However, treatment of diabetes only changed in the 20th century. Prior to 1922, the best treatment for Type 1 diabetes was the Allen diet – an extremely low-carbohydrate and low-calorie diet. The quality of life associated with this unsustainable therapy was poor and adherence only prolonged life for weeks in most cases. Dr. Allen commented that patients were rarely compliant with this diet, often smuggling in a piece of bread. Pictures of the patients from this time reveal severe wasting, now seen only in photos of concentration camp victims and during severe famines.

Insulin, discovered in 1922, changed this. However, the initial insulin preparations were very crude and often made patients very sick. Problems existed as well with allergic reactions to either insulin or contaminants in the insulin preparations. Infections and abscesses were also common with these initial preparations. While short-lived, there were initial questions about the appropriateness of insulin injections as both unnatural and dangerous. The 100% mortality of any other therapy quickly resolved these questions. Initial treatment consisted of multiple injections of what we now call Regular insulin during the day and overnight.

After the initial enthusiasm abated, patients began demanding a way to prolong insulin’s action so that a single injection once a day would suffice. Long-acting insulins were developed, such as protamine zinc. We now know that this advance was actually a step back, and that patients on these once-daily insulin preparations had higher rates of blindness, kidney failure and nerve damage than individuals who had been treated with multiple injections. With either therapy it was unusual for patients diagnosed in childhood to live past age 45. Furthermore, their final years were often unpleasant, with loss of vision and kidney failure as well as heart disease.

The current era in diabetes treatment began in the late 1970s and early 1980s with the introduction of hemoglobin A1c testing, patient self glucose testing, multiple daily injections and insulin pumps. These advances have permitted highly motivated patients to live longer than in the past, and in some cases without complications from the diabetes. These results, however, can only be achieved with a level of constant vigilance that is impossible for many to emulate. Even when achieved, there are significant risks associated with low blood sugar reactions that can pose a potentially lethal complication in some cases.

Current research of future diabetes treatments is focused on mechanical devices and biological approaches. The mechanical approach, or “artificial pancreas,” has many limitations because current technology cannot accurately monitor blood sugar levels and calculate how much insulin to administer. The biological approach – some method of transplanting islet cells or islet stem cells – has limitations as well. Transplants generally require immunosuppression drugs, which is a major drawback. Equally important is the absence of adequate islet cell sources for transplant. The use of nonhuman islet cells potentially solves this latter problem but makes the immunosuppresion complications much worse because more intense and therefore more toxic immune suppression drugs are required to prevent rejection of nonhuman islets. The use of stem cells may solve some of these problems, but is still far off in the future and may carry new risks that we currently don’t know.